Exploratory tool · Before, during and after deployment

Assess and monitor an AI use through real work.

Document a specific use at T0, review observed facts at T1, then monitor all nine axis scores over time.

Start the assessment ↓ Understand the approach

Local processing. Answers remain in this browser and are not transmitted by the questionnaire. On a shared device, remember to delete the draft.

18questionsTwo per dimension

9reading anglesWork, organisation and AI

9axis scoresTwo answers per axis

100 %localDeletable draft

01 / A continuous approach

Assess before. Test during. Review after.

The same use case, population and observations must remain identifiable throughout the project.

T0 · Before the pilotTool available

Make assumptions open to discussion.

Describe what could change in the work and what is still missing for a decision.

Open the assessment ↓

Pilot · Real workLimit

Test without creating lock-in.

Observe ordinary cases, exceptions, review workload and the ability to reverse course.

T1 then T2+ · After useMonitor

Review the observed effects.

Revisit the nine dimensions after the pilot and over time, while recording changes in context.

Open follow-up ↓

Method principle

The questionnaire measures neither probability nor clinical severity. It helps identify situations to investigate with workers, their representatives and prevention professionals.

02 / Guided assessment

Examine a specific use case.

No names requestedExplicit local storageComplete export

Before you beginPrepare a useful assessment

One introduction

Choose one use case.

Answer for the most exposed group and the reasonably most demanding situation. If information is missing, say so: do not estimate it.

The report will distinguish

the summary score for each axis;
insufficient or non-applicable information;
the two source answers behind each score;
the actions and decision entered by your group.

Which stage of the project do you want to document?

The framework and nine axes remain the same. Wording adapts to what can be anticipated or actually observed.

T0 Before the pilotIdentify the conditions to investigate before testing. T1 Pilot follow-upReview observed facts after 4 to 8 weeks. T2+ Periodic follow-upObserve established use and changes in work.

Your draft stays on this device. You can resume, export or delete it at any time. On a shared device, export and then delete it before leaving.

Follow-up continuityStart from a previous assessment

Import its JSON export to resume the same project without re-entering its context. New answers remain blank.

Step 1 of 4 · Frame

Describe the use case.

This information gives context to the report. Do not enter any identifiable data.

Project referenceUse the same reference for every assessment, without any person’s name.

Main sector

Approximate organisation size

Project stage

Population directly concerned

Assessment date

How mandatory the use is

Task or process concernedDescribe what the system will do and what will remain under human responsibility.

What will the AI be used for? Select all that apply

Generative assistantDrafting, summarising, research Work organisationScheduling, allocation, priority HR decisionsRecruitment, appraisal, mobility Monitoring or controlActivity, attendance, behaviour Health or safetyDecision support, detection Physical systemRobot, machine, vehicle

Step 4 of 4 · Act

Discussion priorities before the pilot.

This profile describes the answers entered. It does not measure a risk level and is not authorisation to deploy.

Local reference——

Summary scores for the nine axes

Each point is the mean of the axis’s two numeric answers, out of 4.

View detailed radar values

Exact scores and answers used in the radar
Axis	Score / 4	Answers used

Score and detail by axis

The mean summarises both answers. Any answer of 3 or 4 remains highlighted as an individual point requiring attention.

Information to complete

Non-applicable situations

Decision documented by the group

No option is preselected or inferred from the answers.

Direction chosen at this stage Continue the assessmentFurther checks are still required. Correct before the pilotConditions must change. Limit or suspendThe current scope is not retained. Decision deferredInformation is insufficient.

Reasons and reservations

Exportable action plan

Suggestions can be edited. Add an owner, a due date and the expected evidence.

Measure to take	Owner	Due date	Status	Evidence or review criterion	Action

View all 18 answers

03 / From results to decision

The questionnaire opens the discussion. It does not close it.

Six decisions must be understandable, discussable and traceable before the pilot, then reviewed after use.

Actual need

What work-related problem are we trying to solve, for whom and with what expected result?

Scope

What will the tool be able to do, what will remain human and which uses will remain excluded?

Data and version

What data will flow and which exact version will actually be tested?

Oversight

Who will review, with which skills, authority and available time?

Participation and appeal

How will workers, their representatives and occupational health be involved?

Reversibility

Which effects will trigger correction, suspension or termination of the project?

Professional pilot

Test on a small scale, observe the real work, retain the ability to reverse.

Describe the baseline situation.
Include ordinary cases and exceptions.
Limit the scope and duration.
Decide before any expansion.

04 / Long-term follow-up

Make follow-up a tool for managing work.

A single snapshot is not enough. After the pilot, the same grid helps managers, HR, workers and prevention professionals jointly review workload, room for manoeuvre and actions taken.

T0Before the pilotDescribe the use, baseline situation and anticipated risks.
T14 to 8 weeksExamine the first observed facts and correct pilot conditions.
T2At 3 monthsReview supervision workload, incidents and actual adoption.
T3At 6 monthsReview organisation, skills, autonomy and open actions.
T4+At 12 months, then every 6 to 12 monthsMaintain vigilance while the use, model or work continues to change.

Monitoring log

Keep what makes change interpretable.

a stable project reference, the system and its version;
the observed period and the team or occupations concerned;
changes in scope, objectives, staffing or organisation;
agreed actions, their owner, due date and status.

Manager & HR safeguards

Monitor work, never rank people.

do not use the profile to assess an individual worker or rank teams;
never convert NE or NA to zero or aggregate the nine axes into one total score;
involve users, their representatives and prevention professionals in interpretation;
reopen the assessment after a major change to the system or task, or after an incident.

Also trigger a review

Outside this schedule, complete a new assessment after a major change in model, data, objective, population or organisation — and whenever an incident or field signal warrants it. For shared HR use, this local tool does not replace a secure solution with access rights, defined retention and an audit log.

Prepare a follow-up assessment ↑

05 / Method and limitations

Nine dimensions, kept separate.

The short online grid has 18 questions. The long instrument has 27 items — three per dimension — in two parallel T0/T1 forms and remains a separate development programme.

01Work intensity and working time

02Emotional demands

03Autonomy and decision-making

04Social relations and recognition

05Value conflicts

06Job insecurity

07Opacity and contestability

08Cognitive supervision workload

09Skill erosion

Tool status

This grid is exploratory and non-psychometric. It is neither a diagnosis, proof of compliance nor a complete regulatory risk assessment.

Each axis score is the mean of two numeric answers. It structures discussion and does not combine with the other axes into a total score.

Answers are self-reported. They must be compared with observation of real work and the perspectives of the people concerned.

Sources and guidanceGollac report ↗EU-OSHA · Worker participation ↗Law, works councils and risk assessment →