“AI” does not describe a single tool.
Generating text, assigning a score and allocating tasks are three different functions, with different risks.
Understand · Essential concepts
Distinguish between systems, understand how a language model produces an answer, and read performance results without making them say more than they do.
The landscape still seems open, while the mountain gives the impression of a stable landmark. The work reminds us that an apparent equilibrium can quickly become fragile when the setting changes: understanding an AI system means identifying what must remain under control — the task, the data and the decisions — before novelty hides the weak points. View the artwork ↗
Generating text, assigning a score and allocating tasks are three different functions, with different risks.
It calculates probabilities from context; it does not independently verify whether its answer is true or compliant.
The model matters, but so do the task, the data, the people, the decision rules and the organisation.
01 / Name the system
The term “AI” covers systems that do not produce the same kind of output. To understand a professional use, begin by identifying what the tool actually does.
It creates or transforms text, images, sound or code from an instruction. An LLM-based conversational assistant belongs to this family.
It estimates a probability, assigns a score or classifies a case using past data: default risk, case priority or diagnostic support.
It allocates tasks, sets processing priorities, measures activity or influences a management decision. It may or may not include generative AI.
02 / Inside an LLM
A large language model — or LLM — is a neural network trained to predict what comes next in a text. It does not retrieve a ready-made answer from a database: it composes one, unit by unit.
The prompt and supplied documents are split into small units: words, word fragments or symbols.
Each token is converted into a numerical representation that encodes patterns learned during training.
The Transformer examines relationships between tokens to determine which parts of the context matter most at that point.
The model calculates a probability distribution. Generation settings affect the selection and its variability.
The selected token is added to the context, then the calculation repeats until the answer is complete.
03 / Capabilities & limits
Capabilities depend on the model and version, the language, supplied documents, available tools and how the task is framed.
| Task type | What the model can contribute | What cannot be assumed |
|---|---|---|
| 01Read and write | Summarise, rephrase, translate, extract information, compare documents or prepare a first draft. | Completeness, fidelity to sources, currency of information and suitability for the professional context. |
| 02Reason through a problem | Break down a question, propose hypotheses, apply a described procedure and explain the steps in a calculation. | Consistent correctness. A convincing explanation can accompany a wrong answer. |
| 03Write code and process data | Produce, explain or correct code; prepare a query or exploratory analysis. | Security, robustness and correct behaviour on untested cases. Execution and testing remain essential. |
| 04Use tools | With a suitable application, search the web, consult a document repository, call software or carry out several actions in sequence. | Source quality, authority to act and control of consequences. Access rights must be limited. |
| 05Process multiple media | Depending on the model: describe an image, transcribe audio, analyse a document or answer questions about a video. | Complete perception of detail, understanding of the situation and compliance with profession-specific rules. |
Frequent success on a category of tasks does not predict every answer. Test the errors that matter in your use case.
A provider may change the model, its settings, filters or tools. A useful evaluation records the version and date.
04 / Read the benchmarks
A benchmark measures performance on a set of tasks under a specific prompt, metric and conditions. Change any of them and the ranking may change.
The pages below are maintained by their authors. They provide the latest available results without freezing a ranking here that would quickly become outdated.
05 / Return to real work
A benchmark describes a model’s behaviour in a test. Deployment must also be assessed in the real task, with its constraints, responsibilities and effects on people.
We do not evaluate a model alone. We evaluate the work system formed by the tool, task, data, people who use it and the organisation’s rules.
06 / Before professional use
These questions prevent the product or its reputation from becoming the starting point. They require a concrete description of the use and the means needed to control it.
Describe the current situation, expected outcome, people concerned and points where an error would have serious consequences. “Saving time” is not a task.
Identify personal, confidential or legally protected data; check where it is processed, how long it is retained and how the provider intends to use it.
Name the competent person, include review in the workload and specify the sources against which the answer can be checked.
Distinguish the tool’s suggestion, the human decision and the organisation’s responsibility. Provide a way to challenge, correct or suspend the use.
Before the pilot, choose a small set of useful indicators: quality, errors, review time, workload, autonomy, skills, mutual support and reported difficulties.
Further reading
A short selection from public bodies and research projects that explain their methods. Level and language are shown.
A short definition that establishes the vocabulary without going into technical detail.
CNIL ↗Seven short videos on how it works, its strengths and limits, prompting and tool use.
Inria ↗Tokens, context, parameters, attention, limits and model adaptation.
Google for Developers ↗Benefits, inaccurate outputs, personal data and initial deployment precautions.
CNIL ↗Framework, resources and a profile devoted to generative AI risks.
NIST ↗Connect an evaluation protocol to professional knowledge and the errors that genuinely matter.
AI & Occupational Health ↗