Thomas Cole, The Oxbow, 1836

Thomas Cole, The Oxbow, 1836

About

Why this site?
A professional perspective from within the landscape.

AI systems, work organisation and occupational health.

This independent site extends research, publication and training work on AI in occupational health. It separates established evidence, emerging signals and editorial analysis.
In 30 seconds

Essential points

  • The site is edited independently by Dr Charles Broutin, occupational physician.
  • Published work includes the use of LLMs as a second reader and an article on psychosocial issues associated with language models.
  • The editorial method distinguishes established frameworks, emerging evidence, first-instance rulings and professional analysis.
EstablishedEmergingAnalysis
On this page
  1. Author
  2. Publications and activities
  3. Editorial method
  4. Contact
Profile

Author

Dr Charles Broutin is an occupational physician working on the application and evaluation of artificial intelligence in occupational health. His work focuses on useful but bounded applications, evaluation methods, psychosocial risks and the conditions for responsible deployment.

Professional field

Occupational medicine

A work-centred approach that links clinical practice, prevention, organisation and employment law.

Area of work

Artificial intelligence

Training and applied research on large language models, evaluation and occupational-health use cases.

Editorial goal

Knowledge translation

Publications, teaching and contributions intended to make rapidly evolving evidence usable by occupational-health professionals.

Publications

Publications and professional activities

The site draws on peer-reviewed or professional publications as well as ongoing research. It does not imply endorsement by institutions mentioned in the author’s career or sources.

Published

INRS · TF 335

Study of a large language model used as a second reader of occupational-health recommendations.

Read the article
Published

Archives des Maladies Professionnelles

Article on large language models and new psychosocial issues at work.

View the DOI
Ongoing

Specialised benchmark

Comparative evaluation of LLM performance in French occupational health; results remain withheld here pending publication.

Transparency

Editorial method

Content is dated and revised. Sources are placed as close as practical to the claims they support. Legal information is separated from scientific evidence and from professional interpretation. Material errors can be reported and corrections are made visibly when needed.

Disclosure

Independence

The site is a personal editorial initiative. References to professional bodies or universities describe activities or sources, not institutional sponsorship.

Method

Evidence status

Established law or guidance, emerging findings and editorial analysis are labelled differently where possible.

Scope

Limits

The site provides information, not individual medical advice or case-specific legal advice.

Contact

Contact

Professional enquiries, corrections and suggestions can be sent through LinkedIn or the editorial email address listed in the legal notice.

LinkedIn

The author can be contacted through his professional profile.

Open LinkedIn

French reference profile

The detailed career and publication page is maintained in French.

Open the French page

Search

Enter at least two characters.